![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Thursday, September 23rd, 2004
Just so you all know what I do all day
Thursday, September 23rd, 2004 12:11 pmThis is from a book for which I'm currently producing revised pages (that is, entering the copyedits from the page proofs).
For the concrescual approximation and Whitehead, the subjective aim shapes each process of subject-formation and takes shape too as it calls elements of past experience and contextual details into relevance and leads to a unification involving a coherent objective datum felt in a satisfaction that can affect consequent action. The concrescual approximation treats as an overall lure for feeling, or a “conceptual lure,” all that which could be conceptually felt or called into relevance by an actual forming experient in a specific moment. Each conceptual lure is conditioned by the actual world, operative chreods, subjective aims, and the experient’s personal matrix.
Gaaaaaah.
Sometimes I am glad I don't have to edit these things, just enter the edits.
Apparently both "concrescence" and "chreod" are real words. But Google returns zero hits for "concrescual". I'm just saying. [EDIT: Though it occurs to me that, eventually, it will have this one. Eek.]
For the concrescual approximation and Whitehead, the subjective aim shapes each process of subject-formation and takes shape too as it calls elements of past experience and contextual details into relevance and leads to a unification involving a coherent objective datum felt in a satisfaction that can affect consequent action. The concrescual approximation treats as an overall lure for feeling, or a “conceptual lure,” all that which could be conceptually felt or called into relevance by an actual forming experient in a specific moment. Each conceptual lure is conditioned by the actual world, operative chreods, subjective aims, and the experient’s personal matrix.
Gaaaaaah.
Sometimes I am glad I don't have to edit these things, just enter the edits.
Apparently both "concrescence" and "chreod" are real words. But Google returns zero hits for "concrescual". I'm just saying. [EDIT: Though it occurs to me that, eventually, it will have this one. Eek.]
Well, damn.
Thursday, September 23rd, 2004 10:49 pmGot home from rehearsal (which, I should add, ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
greenlily ran wonderfully)...
to discover that I am running a fever of almost 100.
Hmm. This would explain why I started feeling so run-down and crummy.
It also bodes poorly for Kol Nidrei &c tomorrow night. But we'll see.
And I still haven't written my apology letter, but now I really don't feel like tackling it. I don't even feel like going out to get milk. Maybe bed would be the better part of valor.
greenlily ran wonderfully)...to discover that I am running a fever of almost 100.
Hmm. This would explain why I started feeling so run-down and crummy.
It also bodes poorly for Kol Nidrei &c tomorrow night. But we'll see.
And I still haven't written my apology letter, but now I really don't feel like tackling it. I don't even feel like going out to get milk. Maybe bed would be the better part of valor.