Support the T as a venue for artistic expression
Wednesday, November 19th, 2003 02:12 pmFrom
queendeb:
Save Boston's Subway performers!
http://www.petitiononline.com/Tmusic/petition.html
(But can I exempt that guy who makes that awful didgeridoo racket in the Central Square station during morning rush hour?)
Save Boston's Subway performers!
http://www.petitiononline.com/Tmusic/petition.html
(But can I exempt that guy who makes that awful didgeridoo racket in the Central Square station during morning rush hour?)
no subject
Date: Wednesday, November 19th, 2003 11:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, November 19th, 2003 11:38 am (UTC)I always wonder if that is a promise because I would physically hold people back from giving him money if that were the case.
No...
Date: Wednesday, November 19th, 2003 12:33 pm (UTC)Re: No...
Date: Wednesday, November 19th, 2003 12:52 pm (UTC)Of course, each of us should support the side of this debate that we see fit.
Re: No...
Date: Wednesday, November 19th, 2003 12:55 pm (UTC)I kindly suggest an upgrade of the speaker system so they can be understood, which they currently can't be even in silence. I'd also recommend a streaming text sign in addition the speaker system for those of us who can read better than we can hear.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, November 19th, 2003 01:38 pm (UTC)But you're right about the speakers. The only words I can usually make out are "Thank you for riding the T." Although if they broadcast an actual ALARM in an emergency that would make a difference, and I could see loud music drowning that out.
I don't care for T-music anyway. Either I don't like it, or I do like it and feel like I ought to give the guy money, when I haven't asked for the service he's providing or agreed to pay for it.
Re: No...
Date: Wednesday, November 19th, 2003 01:24 pm (UTC)At this point I am thinking of petitioning for a permit just to have one. I think stating that I will bein singing Yule-tide carols might work.
Re: No...
Date: Wednesday, November 19th, 2003 01:54 pm (UTC)1) one of the musicians i enjoy most plays a recorder along with recorded pieces of music. sure, he could just play the recorder, as the new policy eliminates the recorded pieces of music due to amplification, but that does severely limit the artistic scope of the music, which seems to me a shame.
2) electric guitars and acoustic guitars sound very different, and not everything that works on one will work on the other.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, November 19th, 2003 12:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, November 19th, 2003 02:21 pm (UTC)I've never gone down to the opposite end of the platform to see what the hell kind of object he's actually playing (or even if it's in fact a he); the sound is so oppressive that I just cower in my usual spot and hope it ends.
I mean, I am all for artistic expression, and although I personally dislike the sound this guy produces (and wouldn't mind some form of popular case-by-case veto power!), I don't want a blanket regulation blocking an entire category of instruments or performers, either.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, November 19th, 2003 01:43 pm (UTC)who knew
that this was something that really annoys people so much?
when i was little
i used to look forward to the times when we would go downtown
to filene's basement
because it seemed romantic to me
that there was free music
echoing
i think i once wrote a story about it in elementary school
ah well.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, November 19th, 2003 02:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, November 19th, 2003 04:11 pm (UTC)And I've seen the guy in Central too (now that I live near there), but like you, I've never gone to see what makes that horrible noise. I figure that if I did, it would only be encouraging him. Heh.
no subject
Date: Thursday, November 20th, 2003 07:39 am (UTC)