aaaaaaaaaugh!

[chanaleh]

Bunch o' links from my friend Ben in Oklahoma: E-voting fraud rampant in states without paper trails. (Duh! Yes, I know, but here:)

http://www.bluelemur.com/index.php?p=388
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/2004votefraud.html
http://www.blackboxvoting.com/
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1699421,00.asp
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0310/S00211.htm
http://www.wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,65535,00.html?tw=wn_story_mailer

Kerry let us all down with his poor excuse for a campaign, and now he's letting us all down by passively stepping back when he should be fighting this into the ground. How can he? How?

Comments

[navrins]

Push for full investigation of the discrepancies between exit polling and official election tallies in places with paperless voting machines. (See http://www.cannonfire.blogspot.com/ for "the case for fraud.") But do it WITHOUT implying that this election should be contested. Maybe it should, maybe it shouldn't - but the call will be more effective if we accept the result this time regardless of fraud. If we can prove that there WAS fraud - not just might have maybe been, but actually WAS - then maybe we can push through changes to make sure it doesn't happen next time.