chanaleh: Muffin the Vampire Baker: "It's him, Muffin! You have to protect him at all costs!" "I'M ON IT!" (i'm on it!)
10 goals from 2012 ( cf. original list: LJ | DW )
A mixed bag, but overall, progress was made. )

10+ additional achievements of 2012:
It was actually a good and stabilizing year for me, despite the ongoing crises in the world at large. )
11. ... And, oh yeah, turned 40 and had an awesome celebration to mark it.

10 goals for 2013:
Some that build on last year's, and some new ones. )

Wishing all of us a year of physical health, emotional growth, and spiritual abundance.
chanaleh: Muffin the Vampire Baker: "It's him, Muffin! You have to protect him at all costs!" "I'M ON IT!" (i'm on it!)
In my last post ( LJ | DW ) a week ago, I mentioned that I was pondering scaling my wardrobe down by half.

So today, rather than work on books (either writing or layout), I spent a few hours inventorying every single piece of clothing I have. Seriously.

The total comes to 715 pieces. That's including shoes, socks, underwear, the works. )

Which sounds like a LOT, but when you look at everything together, it doesn't really LOOK like a crazy amount.

([livejournal.com profile] justom: "I don't think you're allowed to tease me anymore about the number of dress shirts I own!" Me: "Yes, but at least now I'm embarking on this purging process!" Him: "Mm... true.")

But having decided to do it this way, I think, honestly, that a 50% reduction is an unreasonable goal. Maybe from where I started last year before moving, I could have done it... but to get down to 358 items? I'm halfway up to there in socks and underwear alone! (I suppose that's part of the point, yes, but still.)

Thus, I am setting the official goal at 400 pieces, which is about 60% of the current total, and naming this the Wardrobe 400 Project.

If I can cut more than that, I will earn myself the right to buy a few awesome (well-constructed and properly-fitting) replacement pieces. ;-)

Note that I also have an entire bin (probably really two bins' worth, at this point, it's so overflowing) of costume pieces which I have not yet inventoried -- I thought I might try including all of those in the count as well, but I think I will have to treat that as a separate effort.

The 50% Project

Saturday, November 3rd, 2012 10:06 am
chanaleh: (Default)
As a project in the vein of decluttering and voluntary simplicity, I have started toying with the notion of cutting my wardrobe down by half.

The motivation for setting this particular benchmark is basically as follows: There is a large swath of my clothing inventory that I just don't need or wear that much, but am loath to part with because it's basically still good or I might eventually need/want it again. But a different way of breaking it down is: if I had to choose between A and B, and could only keep one, which would I keep? And when I frame it that way for myself, the answer is almost always stunningly clear.

The funny thing about it, though, is that much the same dynamic plays out on the local level of choosing what to wear every day. If I could wear either A or B today, which am I going to wear? And if I can acknowledge the truth that I would rather wear A on six occasions out of seven, how many B's do I really need to hold onto? Couldn't I retire six B's and replace them with one more A, which I will love six times as much in the long run?

The corollary to this is: If I didn't have this piece, and saw it in a store tomorrow, would I even try it on? and if I did try this particular garment on, would I like it enough (in terms not just of style, but of fit and of my current needs and habits) to buy it? Very often, if there's a garment I own that I pull out and then decide against wearing over and over again, it's because the fit is not quite right or even downright unflattering. Sometimes, especailly when trying to get dressed for a special occasion, this even leads to the realization that there is never a time when I would choose to wear B in favor of A -- usually because of the fit -- and that's when I definitely send B to the giveaway pile.

Sidebar: When I first mentioned the idea to [livejournal.com profile] justom, he said "Ah, great! Then you'd have room for a whole bunch of NEW things!" I said "I like the way you think, but I don't think that's my goal here." :-) Admittedly, it's kind of like the notion that you should lay off a certain percentage of your workforce each year, in order to "cut the deadwood"... thereby freeing up space/resources for new growth. But I think the idea of reducing the total mass is also essential to the plan -- at least, for me, at this time.

Now, it's tempting to try to stage a one-day blitzkrieg where I would pull every stitch of clothing I own into one giant mountain and force myself to divide it into two giant mountains, In and Out. While this would be tremendously satisfying in some ways (and could make a great promo episode for Jerica Life Counseling), I don't think it's practical. So I'm thinking I might make it into a longer-term smaller-bites project by (1) first taking a complete count and inventory of my current wardrobe and (2) tracking gradual reductions by the numbers. This would allow me to prune the low-hanging fruit all at once in a few early sessions, and then get gradually more ruthless as the weeks wear on.

Mind, this means I would probably claim in my initial count the handful of items that are already sitting in a giveaway pile on the floor of my closet, just to give myself a head start. :-}

Thoughts?

December 2024

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15 161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags